MightyGanesha.com
TheDivaReview.com
 









|

Kids,
did you ever have the feeling while sitting in class during a lecture
that the person delivering the lesson may not be quite as brilliant as
they think they are? Well, it happens rarely to Yon Elephant-Head
because I reckon everybody has got more going in the smarty department
than I do. However, this next film did give me the novel feeling of
having my intelligence insulted for 110 minutes.
Funny Games is a shot-for-shot remake of German
director Michael Haneke’s 1997 thriller. According to my interview with
Haneke (- a very lovely fellow, by the way) he said he felt that
Americans had such a romance with violence in movies that it was
important for US audiences to see his film about violence being
perpetrated for violence’s sake - and there’s your whole film in the
nutshell, violence for violence’s sake.
An affluent yuppie couple and their son are on
holiday at their summer home by a lake when they find their home invaded
by two eerily ingratiating young men in summer whites. They take the
family hostage, but want nothing from them except to inflict
psychological and physical tortures that for some reason the two men
find amusing. After promising the family that none of them will survive,
they then take their time to carry out their plans to terrorise and
degrade this innocent family. Utilising such allegedly cutting edge
techniques as having a character directly address the audience and later
a climatic moment is literally undone before our eyes; Haneke has
constructed one gimmicky, pretentious mess of a film that deservedly or
not, will generate controversy. Generating controversy, after all, is
Haneke’s unabashed goal, would that it was making a better film.
The one good thing I can say for the US version of
Funny Games is the performances by the cast are incredible. In my talks
with Tim Roth, Michael Pitt and Brady Corbet, the film’s father and two
torturers, I discovered that the creation of Funny Games was kind of a
torture of its own. Fortunately for Haneke, directing an
English-speaking cast, he employed actors who turned that frustration
into grist for fine performances. Roth and Naomi Watts as the two
parents are studies of the different reactions such random, unexpected
terror can bring out in people. Watts’ Ann is like a trapped lioness,
confused by what is happening but raging against her captors for the
sake of her family. In her most raw performance, Watts displays physical
weariness after being toyed with ruthlessly, shaking to her core and
bleary eyed, she believably keeps what wits she has left about her.
Tim
Roth’s George will forever be regarded as one of the worst fathers in
cinematic history – probably mostly by Roth himself. The namby-pamby
milquetoast intent on being civil initially refuses to listen to the
panicked pleas of his wife to eject the two strangers who refuse to
leave his house. The realisation that he really should’ve listened to
Ann quickly arrives via a golf club to the knee, George spends the rest
of the film helpless and impotent, even acquiescing to the visitors’
demand to have him ask Ann to strip naked for their pleasure. Without
spoiling too much for the adventurous souls who will go see this, some
truly horrible acts (- far worse than the strip command) occur
right before George’s eyes and at no point does he ever fight back with
any conviction, aching leg or no aching leg. He leaves all the
aggression to Ann, knowing the lives of his entire family depend on his
actions. For Roth, this must’ve been an acting triumph, a real test to
keep his instincts at bay playing the most ineffective man in the world
and it’s a tribute to his talent that he uses the challenge to make the
frustration so evident in George’s eyes.
Michael Pitt revisits his old
Murder by Numbers thrill-killer stomping grounds, this time as the
leader, mocking and utterly psychotic. Brady Corbet as the lumpy,
sociopathic sidekick does a wonderful job in baiting the audience into
thinking for the smallest second that he might be swayed into sympathy
for his victims and taking the hope away time and again. Funny Games is
even more frustrating because we’re viewing these fine actors do some of
their best work for such an unworthy effort.
The sheer crassness of the ham-fisted way Haneke
believes he’s holding up a mirror to US audiences and teaching them a
lesson, smacks of protesting too much. Sure, Americans like film
violence, but I daresay Germans and other cultures do, as well. Who in
the world hasn’t wanted to be Bruce Lee? Who hasn’t enjoyed Arnold
Schwarzenegger’s Terminator films (- at least the first one)? Who
didn’t hold their breath as Sigourney Weaver in Aliens and Anne
Parillaud in La Femme Nikita blasted their way out of sticky situations
with the help of some outsized firepower? I’m also pretty sure that many
of Michael Bay’s films have made a few euros, yen, rubles and
pesos outside of the States.
The difference with Michael Bay’s films is that
we’re not looking at reality; Funny Games in mood and action very
intentionally tries to resemble a snuff film, and I’ve yet to see a US
filmgoer who didn’t live in a rubber room give one of those a standing
ovation. Haneke at one point delivers a scene that he emphatically
believes is his personal “Gotcha” moment, catching the audience out in
cheering for a murder. There is so much wrong with this statement,
considering the scene (- which is twisting in my trunk not to give
away) is completely engineered by Haneke to elicit the very response
he is looking for, therefore buying into the very thing he’s complaining
about. He drains the audience manipulation well too many times in
different scenes to be forgiven. One other thing, I don’t know how this
sort of thing flies in Germany, but I’m gonna put my trunk out there and
say that for most filmgoers the relentless terrorising of small children
is always a bad call. The whole exercise is arrogant, condescending and
transparent, and that’s all the time I’m gonna spend on Funny Games.
If you’ll excuse me, I’ve got A Clockwork Orange
warming up in the DVD player. I prefer a bit more style and a lot more
competence in my anti-violence parables.
~ Mighty Ganesha
March 11th, 2008
© 2006-2022 The Diva Review.com |
Photos
(Courtesy of Warner Independent
Pictures)
|
|