|
|||
|
Director Daihachi Yoshida’s darkly comic cinematic slices of life have been winning awards since 2007’s Funuke Show Some Love, You Losers! Having been a hit at 2013’s Japan Cuts with The Kirishima Thing, director Yoshida returns to our shores with Pale Moon, the seething and shining story of an unlikely thief. Dig it!
NYAFF 2015 Daihachi Yoshida
The Lady Miz Diva: During Pale Moon’s flashbacks to Rika’s childhood, I got the impression that she seemed to have a purer sense of charity and kindness and the nun’s teachings than the nuns do. I’m curious as to what your view of Rika was? Daihachi Yoshida: You used the word, “pure,” and that’s very interesting, because I think the word pure has a very positive connotation in English, but it also has a different side to it as well, right? It also connotes being exposed and completely wild. She’s untainted by social rules and morals. Of course, she’s genuine and pure, but she’s also a very dangerous creature in that sense. That’s how I imagine Rika.
DY: I probably did use those words when directing her, but at the same time, by the time that she completely read the screenplay, I think we both agreed on who Rika is, and we could completely share the vision of her. We saw eye to eye and that only was confirmed through her performance.
LMD: Money only seems to bring Rika unhappiness, but then she goes and finds the boy that she sponsored when she was a young girl. Was that meant to represent an underlying message, that even though money can bring sadness, you can use it to a positive end? DY: There’s a line, and above it is happiness, and below it is unhappiness: So, when she did not possess that money, the variation between her happiness and unhappiness was very narrow, but when she possessed money, the range widened. I think she chose to have that range from happiness to unhappiness, rather than just having a very narrow experience.
LMD: Your films have a sweet side and an acid side. How do you know how to balance the sugar and the cyanide so that it’s not too much one way or the other? DY: I think it’s just my philosophy towards life; I don’t want to lead a life that’s just purely fun, but I don’t want to lead a life that’s full of struggle. I need both. I don’t know if I’m doing it consciously, but I will tell you that in regards to Pale Moon, I think I’m a pretty mean person. The reason why I say this is because if I give you a lot of sweet, the mean becomes even more pronounced, but when the mean is continuously mean and difficult; even with a drop of sweetness, it feels even all the more sweet, right? I think I always tease the audience so that I can have a bigger ultimate impact, so I think I keep the audience as thirsty as possible before I give them that one drop of water, and vice versa.
DY: So, my perception of women is that they are under more social pressure than men. So, in that sense, they are much deeper thinkers than men. And I think when women move and act in a film, they can therefore reach things that maybe men can’t. They go beyond them in a sense.
DY: Everybody says that because of how I look. I think that film is very unique in that each and every character that is in that film is a reflection of myself.
DY: I do talk a lot about tone my cinematographer, especially the strength of the color. One of the questions that we consider is, what color is this film? I’m not sure if “mislead” is the right word, but with that first shot, the opening shot of the film, you can say so much in the particular texture of the sound and also the tone of the film; you can communicate that right away to the audience, so I do think deeply about that.
DY: I think I believe that human beings fundamentally cannot change their true nature. It does not change as long as you live. But when you realize that, it’s sort of freeing - it’s liberating. So, I think to live is to see how much you can free yourself, and I think through this film I wanted to show one way you can find your true nature in order to free yourself.
LMD: Because the structures of your films are complex, does that mean you prefer for the actors to stick to what is on the page, or do you enjoy considering their input and contribution? DY: I’m not sure if I prefer them to stick to closely to the script or not. If they make a mistake in delivering the dialogue, and if I like that, if I like how they deviate, I’ll just keep that. But I am very particular about my sense of the character; my image of the character. Some of the actors involved in pale Moon said that I instructed them on how many times they can blink their eyes, or how they shift their weight. So, in essence it’s much bigger than just words on a page; it’s the tone, it’s the nuance of the character. I don’t compromise in that regard. I think I move my actors very precisely and also I restrict them, as well.
DY: It’s very interesting, because I, myself, feel that I am a very passionate person, but the more passionate that I, myself, feel, people say that I’m being very cool and calm, so I think I strive to be a little more emotional, in that sense. It’s very strange and interesting that people perceive me that way.
~ The Lady Miz Diva June 29th, 2015
© 2006-2022 The Diva Review.com
|
||
|